IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF RENO,
COUNTY OF WASHOE, STATE OF NEVADA
CITY OF RENO,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Maria Metko,
Defendant.
Case No. 21TR-08674
Department. One
____________________________/
ADDENDUM TO
OBJECTIONS FILED NOVEMBER 20, 2021 WITH :
1. A MOTION FOR A SUBPOENA TO BE ISSUED OF BODY CAMERA FOOTAGE.
N.R.C.P. 45.
2. A MOTION FOR A CHANGE OF ( local ) JUDICIAL VENUE
3. A MOTION SEEKING COMPENSATORY AND PUNATIVE DAMAGES AND CONTEMPT OF A COURT PROCEEDING BY THE RESPONDENT .
NRS 42.007
[ RESUBMITTED ]
4. An affidavit in support of these motions is submitted.
The respondent ranger good causes showing has located the direct evidence alluded to in her motion entitled.
And, based on the fact it was intentionally omitted by the other party, the movant now enters both of the motions in question previously filed in order to move the other party and court to reveal video footage of a body camera worn by an individual acting as an agent for this court.
As, original drafts of these motions disappeared from the interneted devices that the movant had created them within.
And, now, will make a seperate audio recording of each of them.
As, when the movant repeatedly attempted to use the copy and paste mechanism in her email where copies of these submissions remain, it will not allow the movant to copy them so that she can enter them as text.
Exhibits Four and Five and Six
AUDIO DICTATION OF
------------------------------------
FOUR
---------
Notice of Objections refusing discovery of video.
July 8, 2021.
FIVE
--------
Notice of dupplimental objections with Authorities.
July 20, 2021
SIX
-----
Notice : Respondent's second motion to enact discovery. Email dated November 4 2021.
PROOF OF ELECTRONIC
SERVICE
---------------------------------------
A true copy of these motions, with an affidavit in support of, was electronically served via email to, both, the Reno Municipal Court and the Reno City Attorney's office.
Submitted,
Maria Metko
Respondent Ranger
And Founder of the
Great Basin Wilderness Range Project.
775-433-8607
550 N. MacCarran blvd
Sparks Nevada. 89431
🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠ðŸŒ
The Entire Motion with Objections follows :
IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF RENO,
COUNTY OF WASHOE, STATE OF NEVADA
CITY OF RENO,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Maria Metko,
Defendant.
Case No. 21TR-08674
Department. One
____________________________/
OBJECTIONS FILED WITH
1. A MOTION FOR A SUBPOENA OF A BODY CAMERA FOOTAGE FOR DATE,
N.R.C.P. 45.
2. A MOTION FOR A CHANGE OF ( local ) JUDICIAL VENUE
3. A MOTION SEEKING COMPENSATORY AND PUNATIVE DAMAGES AND CONTEMPT OF A COURT PROCEEDING BY THE RESPONDENT .
NRS 42.007
[ RESUBMITTED ]
4. An affidavit in support of these motions is submitted.
More Crimes Are Being Committed, And With Impunity, against the respondent ranger Due to the Irresponsible Misconduct of Unsuitable Public Trust Holders Acting As Courts and Police
---------------------------------++++
Count One
-----------------
Criminal Collusion of Public Court Officials and others acting with them, in order to commit the crime of denying an already set trial date.
Dismissing the case without following proper procedure involving the due process rights of the respondent ranger.
This was done altogether to withold, both, direct and indirect evidence that shows and requires that a genuine court proceeding be conducted in order to bring criminal charges against the actors, who, not only acted knowingly and wantonly to act in complicity with one another, but, are known for doing so, and, in order to explicitly use the color of the laws in ways in which the framers of the West explicitly warned about and decried against within the anti Federalist Papers -- referring to shady motivated persons acting while holding the public trusts in order to intimidate lawful acting persons in the process of lawful redress in defending substantial rights as stated throughout the respondent ranger's submissions made during this proceeding invloving the right of a trial proceeding to confront accusers who also turn out to be assailants by a proven fit and reliable person.
Court two
----------------
This criminal collusion of these actors holding public trust, involves them witholding the direct evidence of body camera footage demonstrating that the respondent ranger was correct in her findings of criminal acts coupled with the assailants using their public trust positions to evade justice through attempted intimidation directed at the respondent ranger for fitfully acting and persuing her personal interests as a respondent ranger in this matter.
This includes ignoring the respondent ranger's written motions, repeatedly, to enact discovery to review camera footage and answer depositions.
Nev.R.Civ.P. 37 🔥
Count Three
--------------------
The public scamdemic scare was an out right hoax brought about by public trust holders on every level --- Everywhere..
Power corrupts, and, the desire for absolute control corrupts absolutely. As a result everything corrupt written based upon a NWO universal budget plan had played, both, a direct and indirect role in disrupting civil matters already resolved or in the process of resolution. See American case law covering ex post facto actions.
Based upon these additional counts, coupled with the criminal counts laid within the respondent ranger's motion to seek criminal tort damages,
The respondent ranger now moves this proceeding in the following motions...
----
A.Motion for a change of Local judicial venue.
-----------------------
The individual sitting as acting magistrate failed to show proper impartiality regarding the case before them, Therefore, prejudicing the respondent ranger's cause of actions.
In fact, it's certain to claim that this individual along with the other actors hold criminal gang related influences and reputations within this metropolitan-ized region.
Lastly, these actors used the fact that the respondent ranger claiming ADA status to conveniently take it upon each other to claim the respondent ranger, and not them, demonstrated a capacity issue for their misconduct designed to escape being expertly grilled at trial by her and the supporting evidence they're own misconduct accrued for them.
Further, as acting magistrate they threatened the respondent ranger inferring they intended to use their egregious misconduct
of obstructing a proceeding to continue, under the garb of the laws and their collusive public trust status, coupled with the lack of oversight and accountability caused by bad supreme Court rulings removing prior safeguards, to continue enacting their criminal and befouling acts at the respondent.
This includes these actors and their criminal element making day-to-day reality an unequal playing field so as their element can act with all the impunity they like at others.
The respondent ranger has knowledge both, directly and indirectly of how this element has acted, after dominating this region, towards those who like the respondent ranger have established legitimate roots in the region.
In one example, this element puts one another up to as "cops" to act as bird dogs for one anothers cowardly depraved, villain like, misbehaviors towards other people, like the respondent ranger, who has successfully choosen since her younger years to honor the spirit of her ancestors natural rural roots as a pioneering white woman ranger, and, who proved worthy to call themselves persons, let alone genuine Americans for doing so.
In this instance, the miscreants kept squirting lighter fluid on a homeless man while asleep and lighting him up. The respondent ranger took a photo of the end result.
B.Motion to Invoke a Subpoena of Direct and Indirect evidence within a police Body Camera Involving DATE of Interaction
Based upon the collusion of crimes committed against the respondent ranger being coupled with the accomplices using the color of legal authority to further pervert the meaning behind genuine American law and justice,
The respondent ranger moves this matter for any lawful acting agency to force these assailants to publicly avail the public record as to the contents of the body camera footage involving the DATE the citation in question was issued the worthy respondent ranger.
The change of venue sought is not area based but to disqualify the initial presider for their gross disregard shown in the handling of this case. 🔥
Therefore, good causes shown, this motion should be granted.
---
Exhibits
-------------
One.
Anecdotal evidence.
During the Winter of 2019 and 20, right after exposing the criminal element within the Lockwood area as tying into the rest of the element along freeways in the vicinity, including police, as responsible for the arsony and espionage to the respondent ranger's vehicles and range, the gang accomplices within the executive security outfit put one another up to stalking the respondent ranger who patronized a local Starbucks and Scheels complex.
During this time, the respondent ranger was, without prior permission, approached and threatened by an assailant acting as security by acting suspicious in their conduct with other assailants.
The respondent ranger gave full account within the previous case these assailants acted under the color of the laws upon this contenent.
Not long following that case, one of these assailants acting as agents of the same executive security outfit, on Christmas day, where the respondent ranger had just patronized a scheelsplex restaurant, was approached inappropriately for using the device charge ports. The assailant deliberately and wantonly made threats and claimed these ports were for work crew only.
Seeing through this the respondent ranger warned it to go away and leave them alone, or they'd be constutionally arrested for stalking and harassment.
After the respondent ranger decided she was ready to leave, she headed in the direction towards the restroom and northeast parking area to leave. As she started to open the door leading to the restroom, the same assailant, without good cause, pulled the door from her and locked it ( battery ).
Two
-------
On numerous occasions, in particular, the location of Lemmon Drive and Military Road, where the respondent ranger was preparing in advance as any sensible person wood, to merge and make a left onto military road certain persons, mainly Hispanic males, rudely passed the respondent ranger while holding down their horn.
Remember, old school, rural ( Nevada, Montana, Wyoming ) persons like the respondent ranger are persons with overall veteran and advanced experience, on and off where the rubber meets the road. And, inevitably proven reliable first, middle and last responders.
Three.
----------
As of this writing individuals of this same element took it upon themselves to steal the respondent ranger's pack basket while they were in a coffee shop off of Damonte Ranch Parkway, 5 am in the morning. Can you guess what element ?
---
A MOTION SEEKING COMPENSATORY AND PUNATIVE DAMAGES
----------------------------------
Based upon the following elements being met by these crimes committed against the respondent ranger, the motion should be granted :
Count 1. false imprisonment through capricious persecution while acting under the color and impersonation of the Constitution of the United States of America.
Count 2. After being correctly identified by the respondent ranger as tying in with the primary suspects ( druggies, thieves ) located as habitating in the urban development refered to as Lockwood Nevada, and following its suit to others within the Lemmon Valley range location, continually and repeatedly conspiring with other identifiable suspects in order to, under the same impersonation, repeatedly stalking the respondent so as to acost and rob the respondent essentials and woodsman's pack basket.
Count 3. The assailants are acting in collusion with the rest of the druggie populus in hopes of repeatedly depriving the respondent ranger from succeeding in seeking entitled to tort compensation and damages to restore her as the sole and rightful beholder of her valuables required so she can return to her unequalled to way of life.
And, instead, continue their depraved inequities in the form of their societal based criminal acts upon her in hopes of unjustly cheat and deprive her by forcing her, instead, into something less than she worthily attained herself -- what they deem their druggie infested and depraved poor vicinity.
Further proving, the American constitution was not intended for such largely criminal populations but for individual persons like the rustic rural respondent ranger who are historically and continually invaded by such unfit elements.
The events out laid under the American Declaration of Independence, alludes to this phenomenon presently.
Count 4. Conspiring to use religious books and their superstitions instead of extessential facts and the laws in the proper manner and intent to complicity collude by threats of falsification in order to deprive a person of their proper personhood, effects, and character while the person is forced to endure the oppressions described under societal oppression by being held indefinitely among the populus while being deprived of their means to continue their separation from the populus as they had done happily so the past 40 plus years.
The fact is, all god-centrick religion was devised politically to treat the individual as chattel. Religion is a political tool of oppression and the fatalistic based abuses of all life through militarism.
There's nothing moral or ethical about choosing or not choosing servitude towards a society of largely a proven demented populus, That is out right slavery.
No society has a right to abuse persons who chose of their own conscience and free will not to serve it. That is the case here. Neither do such person owe such societies justification for not doing so.
Personal Conviction is a life process acquired amid nature and nature's laws of existential truth - the real world, not a god or gods fatalistic anti nature's world.
In fact the ones who committed the crimes against the respondent ranger did so using their oppressive nihilistic bible to violate her dignity as a rustic rural white woman for successfully following her own wisdom to not depend on anyone else ( society ) and, instead, act on her own life long desire to follow the worthy example of her pioneering white ancestors in the American woods..
As their sick society put it in their Turk book of vanities for their races to erect gods of their racial vanities and force it upon those of us to bow down to a largely sick so called human race who rightly find doing such things as repugnant being we're persons of genuine self wrought integrity, honor and dignity.
Such persons don't want the demented dramas we've seen enough of in the past, and now presently, being forced upon us. That is our substantial right.
Therefore, it is unlawful for such an oppressive society to encroach upon or force itself upon such persons who tell it to go away and leave them alone.
This includes their attempts to devise their demented schemes under the color of civil laws only designed to oppress such persons.
Freedom is the bedrock of required individual disobedience to such vertu less schemes.
RELIEF SOUGHT
1. Based upon the fact that the US Congress had in the past two years given every state and municipality emergency budget monies due to the Covid scare to specifically assist destitute persons like the respondent ranger, it is only sensible that these monies be used in this matter to compensate the respondent and promptly.
As, many municipalities have not been using these monies at all for what they were intended for -- helping simple persons like the respondent ranger.
2. These monies should be in the amount of $ 10,000.000 due to the types of losses ( see previous photo exhibits ), the many years it took to acquire and maintain these effects for someone of the respondent rangers monetary and self reliance resources, and, the impact of the grevious and deviating nature of these acts, which only resulted in the respondent ranger being continually stalked and robbed by the same corrupt mixed element while the ranger respondent was doing everything within her means to work towards self restoration so she could get back to her deserved range habitation.
Persuasive and binding authorities :
Bill Yates, Stephen Gardner,
La Late, and Blind to Billionaire.
YouTube bulletins.
These YouTube creators are expert researchers and financial consultants who have made it their passion to keep their subscribers up-to-date to the last moment of the twists and turns of the current Congress concerning their proposed Covid crisis oriented budget bills.
Definitions of harm and negligence, malfeasance.
NRS 42.001:
Conscience disregard, fraud, malice and oppression.
NRS 42.005 Exemplary and punitive damages: In general; limitations on amount of award; determination in subsequent proceeding.
1. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 42.007, in an action for the breach of an obligation not arising from contract, where it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant ( actors ) has been guilty of oppression, fraud or malice, express or implied, the plaintiff (respondent ranger ), in addition to the compensatory damages, may recover damages for the sake of example and by way of punishing the defendant.
Except as otherwise provided in this section or by specific statute, an award of exemplary or punitive damages made pursuant to this section may not exceed:
Theyve done this repeatedly at the respondent ranger, over and over the past several years, in doing so, disgracefully flaunting the garb of American justice.
----
Victor Greco – Personal Injury Lawyer – O’Dwyer & Bernstien
"Punitive damages are usually imposed to make an example of the negligent party to deter others from behaving in the same fashion or committing similar wrongful behavior. While the intent and purposes of punitive damages imposed on a company are not designed to compensate the plaintiff, they will receive the monetary award. If punitive damages are ordered by a court, they are essentially punishing the defendant, who must pay the amount of money designated and give it to the plaintiff. "
And ....
General Damages
These damages are harder to calculate because they are subjective. In personal injury cases, the immediate losses can be apparent, but the long-term effects are often not visible. There is emotional distress, pain and suffering, PTSD, disfigurement, shortened life expectancy, and any long-term medical care and treatments for injuries that take time to emerge (i.e. concussions or traumatic brain injuries). Even an injury such as defamation can be considered as qualifying for general damages.
---
✅✅✅
THE ROLE OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN THE ADA
In general, when a plaintiff proves that a defendant violated the law, the court can issue a court order -- referred to as an "injunction" -- directing the defendant to refrain from its unlawful conduct and to undo the resulting consequences. This type of remedy is called injunctive or equitable relief. Courts may also require the defendant to pay sums of money -- termed "damages" -- to the plaintiff as monetary compensation for the loss or injury the plaintiff suffered, or to penalize the defendant for engaging in especially reprehensible unlawful acts. "Actual" or "compensatory" damages are sums paid to a plaintiff to compensate for a proven injury or loss. "Punitive damages" are amounts awarded to a plaintiff in addition to actual damages when the defendant acted with malice, recklessness, or deception. Punitive damages are designed to punish the lawbreaker, and to deter future unlawful conduct by the defendant and by others who might be tempted to engage in similar conduct.
All of these constructs would apply in this case with regard to the respondent ranger being approached in the manner the assailant making their premeditated malicious intentions towards the respondent ranger clear on their initial approach.
Further, this added to the respondent ranger's already demanding situation their element is to be directly faulted for, where, these assailants in their capriceous ignorance we're looking to make the matter more overwhelming to prevent the respondent ranger from restoration to return home, in their blatant attempts to misuse the garb of the law in order to mock and intimidate the respondent ranger for exposing their criminalities, thereby, only causing unneeded mental anguish ( ire ) and wasteful stress to the respondent ranger not able to return to their habitation of freedom with her previous vehicles where she needs to regularly resupply water and other regular essentials.
This constitutes as malicious caprice of false imprisonment of the respondent ranger not wishing to remain in this vicinity but be restored to her former situation as stated.
Under NRS 200.640, Nevada law defines the crime of false imprisonment as restricting someone else's freedom to move.....
The intentions, actions and out come of these assailants accosting and hindering the dutiful respondent ranger to deprive her of her lawful rights as expressed certainly qualify as meeting the criteria of the conspiracy to retaliate by committing acts of false imprisonment against the respondent ranger for her dutiful actions against these criminal imposters.
Whether known or unknown by the assailants, the respondent ranger has been awarded ADA status. Thus, awarding these damages should teach a lesson. ✅✅✅
---
Current Controlling opposition Fad Culture :
Tom MacDonald, Canadian, white junkie, rap artist, city dweller, hater of rustic rural white culture. Calls us all hobos / bums while shown murdering a homeless person in their sleep, on the ground.
A true copy of this motion was electronically served via email to, both, the Reno Municipal Court and the Reno City Attorney's office.
Other Binding and Persuasive Authorities :
-------------------
---
Affidavit in support of the motions submitted
------------------------------------------
Under the penalty of perjury under the Nevada Revised Statutes, I Maria Metko, respondent ranger to these entitled matters swears to the best of their own knowledge, that the claims made within these submissions, is true and correct.
The affiant swears no further.
Sincerely
Maria Metko
Respondent ranger
Founder of the Great Basin Wilderness Range Project
550 North MacCarran Blvd
Sparks Nevada 89431
775- 433-8607
PROOF OF ELECTRONIC
SERVICE
---------------------------------------
A true copy of these motions, with an affidavit in support of, was electronically served via email to, both, the Reno Municipal Court and the Reno City Attorney's office.
Submitted,
Maria Metko
Respondent Ranger
And Founder of the
Great Basin Wilderness Range Project.
775-433-8607
550 N. MacCarran blvd
Sparks Nevada. 89431
No comments:
Post a Comment